The Self-Trust Gap

By: Jacqueline Rose, PCC - Executive & Leadership Coach

When capable leaders get stuck trying to make the right decision

I see incredibly capable leaders get stuck all the time.

Not because they don't have enough experience.

Not because they aren't smart enough to make the decision.

And often, not because they actually need more information.

They are trying to eliminate uncertainty before they move.

They want to know the decision is right. They want to anticipate the consequences.

They want to feel confident that the next move will work before they make it.

So they think.

They research.

They ask people they trust.

They ask me what I think.

They gather more feedback and more advice.

And instead of becoming clearer, they become more confused.

More what-ifs appear.

More variables need to be considered.

The decision gets bigger.

And nothing happens.

This is what I think of as The Self-Trust Gap.

Confidence and self-trust are not the same thing

We often think we need more confidence before we act.

But confidence wants evidence.

Confidence says: I know this will work.

Self-trust says:

I don't know exactly how this will work, but I trust myself to handle what happens next.

That distinction matters.

Because leadership requires us to make decisions without certainty all the time.

There will always be information we don't have.

Consequences we can't predict.

Variables we can't control.

And sometimes there simply isn't a clearly right answer.

The problem isn't uncertainty.

The problem begins when we believe we need to eliminate uncertainty before we're willing to move.

"I need more information" can mean something else

There are absolutely decisions that require more information.

But I've noticed that information gathering can also become a very convincing disguise for reassurance seeking.

One more conversation.

One more opinion.

One more scenario to work through.

One more person telling us they think we're making the right decision.

It feels responsible.

Until the additional information stops helping us make the decision and starts helping us avoid it.

I see this at every level of leadership.

And I see it particularly often around one question:

What's next for me?

A new role.

A bigger role.

A business idea.

A career change.

A significant initiative.

Something the leader wants to create but hasn't quite allowed themselves to begin.

These decisions carry more than practical consequences. They carry identity with them.

Suddenly we aren't only asking, "Will this work?"

We're asking:

What if I make the wrong choice?

What if I don't live up to my potential?

What if people see me try and it doesn't work?

What if I regret it?

What if I fail?

So we try to think our way into certainty.

Except certainty isn't available.

We make failure much bigger than it usually is

I know this thinking because I've experienced it myself.

Starting my own business was terrifying.

What if I failed?

Even the question made failure sound like one giant event.

As though I would make the decision to start a business and eventually receive a verdict: success or failure.

That isn't what happened.

Building a business has been hundreds of smaller decisions.

Some worked.

Some didn't.

Some created opportunities I couldn't have anticipated.

Others gave me information that caused me to change direction.

I experimented.

I learned.

I adjusted.

And I kept going.

The thing I understand differently now is that we often imagine the whole thing failing before we've even taken the first step.

But most journeys give us information along the way.

Something doesn't work.

Someone doesn't respond the way we expected.

An idea doesn't land.

We learn something.

We adjust.

We pivot.

We take another step.

There are opportunities to respond long before the entire thing becomes the catastrophic failure we created in our heads.

What I once thought required confidence in the outcome actually required trust in myself to respond to the outcome.

That's a very different thing.

Sometimes I simply call out what I'm hearing

When a leader is caught in this cycle, one of the most useful things I can do is name it.

"I'm wondering if you actually need more information, or if you're looking for reassurance that you're making the right decision."

Often, that stops the conversation.

Because they hadn't seen it that way.

Then we look backwards.

Think about all the difficult decisions you've already made.

How many worked exactly as planned?

Probably not many.

And yet, you're here.

You've dealt with unexpected outcomes before.

You've changed direction.

You've recovered from mistakes.

You've learned things you couldn't possibly have known beforehand.

You've handled difficult conversations.

You've made decisions without knowing exactly what would happen.

Some worked.

Some didn't.

And you figured things out.

We are surprisingly quick to forget our own resilience when we're facing the possibility of failure.

Your history isn't evidence that you always make the right decision.

It's evidence that you can handle making decisions.

That's the evidence that matters.

The bigger we make the leap, the harder it becomes to move

I've worked with an executive with enormous ideas and incredible potential.

Their mind can see possibilities far into the future.

It's one of their strengths.

It can also become the very thing that freezes them.

An idea quickly becomes the entire initiative.

The first move becomes the final outcome.

Instead of thinking about what could happen next, they're mentally living ten steps ahead, imagining everything that could go wrong.

The action becomes enormous.

And the bigger it gets, the harder it becomes to begin.

When we bring the conversation back to one small step in the right direction, something changes almost immediately.

Energy returns.

Motivation returns.

Movement happens.

The potential was never missing.

Their own thinking was getting in the way of accessing it.

Bring the decision back down to size

When I hear someone disappearing into the what-ifs, I tend to bring the conversation back to a few simple questions:

What's actually at stake?

What's the worst realistic outcome?

If that happened, what would you do?

What evidence do you already have that you could handle it?

And perhaps most importantly:

What's one small step you can take without needing to know the ten steps that follow it?

That last question changes a lot.

Because sometimes the next step gives us information we simply couldn't have had standing still.

Take the step.

See what happens.

Learn something.

Then decide again.

Progress, not perfection.

Self-trust isn't certainty

I don't believe strong leaders become people who never doubt themselves.

I don't think they stop asking thoughtful questions or seeking perspectives from people they respect.

And self-trust certainly doesn't mean charging ahead without considering consequences.

It means knowing the difference between gathering useful information and searching for reassurance.

It means noticing when thoughtful consideration has become avoidance.

It means accepting that some decisions cannot be perfected.

And it means trusting yourself enough to move before you can see the entire path.

We live and lead in a time of enormous uncertainty.

Maybe the answer isn't becoming better at predicting everything that could happen.

Maybe it's becoming better at trusting ourselves when we can't.

So if you're sitting with a decision right now, wondering whether you need more information, more confidence or one more person's opinion, try asking yourself something different:

What do I already know?

What am I afraid might happen?

And if it did, do I trust myself to figure out what comes next?

You don't have to know that everything will work.

You just need enough self-trust to take the next step.

And let the step after that reveal itself.

Explore Leadership Readiness & the Human Side of Leadership →